Skip to content

Conversation

@esezen
Copy link
Contributor

@esezen esezen commented Jan 29, 2026

No description provided.

@esezen esezen requested a review from jjl014 as a code owner January 29, 2026 11:19
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 29, 2026 11:19
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR enables the hiding of previous comments in the Claude code review workflow by adding the hide_previous_comments flag set to true.

Changes:

  • Added hide_previous_comments: true configuration to the Claude review workflow

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@constructor-claude-bedrock
Copy link

Code Review Results

✅ Strengths

Clean and minimal workflow configuration change that adds a UX improvement to hide previous review comments.

🚨 Critical Issues

None

⚠️ Important Issues

None

💡 Suggestions

None

Overall Assessment: ✅ Pass


This PR adds the hide_previous_comments: true configuration option to the Claude Code review workflow, which will help keep the PR conversation cleaner by hiding outdated review comments from previous commits. The change is:

  • Well-scoped: Only modifies the necessary workflow configuration
  • Properly formatted: Correct YAML syntax with appropriate indentation
  • Safe: The secrets: inherit is preserved correctly
  • Documentation: The PR title clearly describes the change

The workflow will continue to inherit secrets and call the shared reusable workflow while now hiding previous comments for improved readability.

No tests are needed for this workflow configuration change, and no security concerns are present.

@esezen esezen merged commit ba667ce into master Jan 29, 2026
9 of 11 checks passed
@esezen esezen deleted the cdx-364-update-claude-code-review-with-hide-flag branch January 29, 2026 11:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants